When I looked over my performance based on the Amazon’s 100 Books to Read Before You Die, I noticed one easy way to knock three titles from the list was to read the Hunger Games series. I think Amazon messed up by making each book a separate entry, but you know, whatever.
The Book
Catching Fire
Author: Suzanne Collins
2010
Amazon Link
The first book, The Hunger Games, outperformed my expectations. The second book, Catching Fire, was somewhat interesting, but it felt like a repeat of the first book. I’m hoping this addition to the trilogy adds something new, but I don’t see how that’s going to happen and be successful. I don’t think Katniss is good enough at pushing the plot forward for her to be active in the last book.
Non-Spoiler Review
I will give this book one thing: it wasn’t a repeat of the first book. I didn’t like how book 2 was basically the same as book 1, so I’m glad Collins didn’t just have another Hunger Game for Katniss to finish.
That being said, I can’t believe how disappointed I was with this book.
I don’t think a civil war/rebellion was a bad direction to take the plot. The problem I had was that Katniss’s ability to influence events at the same time that she always discovered information after everyone else made this book feel a bit unreal. For example, early in the book she’s asked to be the “Mockingjay,” the symbol of the rebellion. She doesn’t know what to do until Prim (the younger sister) tells her to make demands in return for being the Mockingjay. She didn’t make the decision herself, just like every other event in the book.
I also had major issues with Katniss being ‘the best shot’ as opposed to people who were soldiers for their entire lives. I had issues with Katniss bringing down bombers with a bow and arrow, no matter her skill or specialness of the arrows. I had issues with the supply chain mechanics of District 13’s total war machine, but I understand few people study that kind of war strategy.
Overall, the problem I had with the book was lack of any semblance of believability. I think it almost pulled its rather ambitious premise off and almost seemed hardcore, but then it would defeat itself by doing something far beyond unbelievable.
2/5 Discoball Snowcones
SPOILERS REVIEW
Ok, I’m going to talk about the very end here.
First off, I agree that President Coin wasn’t that great a person, and she was somewhat power hungry. Her desire to reinstate the Hunger Games one last time was a bloodthirsty move, but Katnis agreed to it. Then she shot President Coin instead of Snow.
WTF?! That was such a letdown. It seemed to me that she made an incredibly destructive decision, and I can’t bring myself to believe the rebellion was able to hold itself together after coin’s death.
Then there was the epilogue. For three books, Katniss was bound and determined never to have kids in the crappy, post-apocalypse world. In the end, she talked about her PTSD-induced marriage to Peeta (which I didn’t really like, after what happened to Peeta) and her children. It just felt so disjointed, sort of like the Mass Effect Blue Ending.
Also also, I found out that the Capitol was probably supposed to be Salt Lake City, which indicates to me the author intended them to be Mormons. I found that a wee bit religionist (is that a word?).
Next week:
It’s March next week – if you were around for last March, you might be able to guess what those books are going to be about!
I’ve enjoyed your reviews of this trilogy. They haven’t put me off reading the books, cos I didn’t intend to read them anyway. But as a writer, seeing where other people have failed… always a good experience.
Alas, I think if this coming March is an echo of last years, the reviews won’t appeal so much (wrong period of history, wrong geographical location, and then add in the politics… but I could be wrong. I wait to be swayed.
Haha, yeah, they’ll be very similar. April is another indie book month, though!
Oh, yippee!
This one seems to have been a bit of a disappointment, H. This is why I don’t like series because they often seem to taper out.
I’m not sure Collins even had a plan for three books. The first one stood alone so well, and I have to believe that was all she had imagined before it became successful.
Yes, the pressure to write sequels is intense. I don’t think I will though, when I finish writing a book, the characters disappear out of my head.
It depends on the book for me. Usually, though, I have to have some sort of overarching plot or theme that can’t fit within a single volume if I want to try for a series.
Yes, that is how it would be for me too. An on-going story like Lord of the Rings rather than linked stories.
I still intend to read this series one day. My cousin really loved them, and I want to see how they differ from the films, which is not by much it seems…
If you end up reading them, you can do a review on how different they are!
😀 This cracks me up so much.
Okay… I’m coming down from laughing, “Mary Poppins” style. I hadn’t noticed the thing about other people making Katniss’ decisions; good point. Good point on the shooting, too (I have similar complaints about Hawkeye in “Avengers”).
Katniss had to agree with Coin in order to get access to her. She did not want another Hunger Games.
I related to Katniss having children. I don’t want children, yet I have five.
In all, this relates to something my friend said when she first told me about the series. She said, “I like how the main character is human, and a teenager. She hides, gets mad, and makes emotional decisions.” I’m paraphrasing, but it’s similar to what you see in “Big Hero 6.” Even brilliantly precocious children have the emotional maturity of their age, or lower.
Hawkeye in Avengers is ridiculous, yes. And I can see how Katniss’s teenager-ness can be attractive in this book, but that’s really what’s also attractive with Twilight and some other YA – so I didn’t feel it was all that special.
I meant her teenager ness caused crappy decisions. 😀
I dig
And Salt Lake City probably has the lowest population of Mormons…
…Lower than North Carolina? Or than outlying areas of Utah/the Northwest?
True. Compared to the rest of the state.
Anyway, I knew the thing about the location but then just concluded that “they” (the ones in charge) took over the state.
Good idea. Makes it far more palatable!
Finally there is someone who understands my hate towards this book
Hahah – lol, I love it when people agree with me that a book is trashy